Posted in Swords on 02/08/2010 10:07 pm by Fluffy
|
Is this the best of Asia Cup Cricket Idea?
What about having a big tournament (test or one day) in each state and territory of India and Pakistan have their own team, Sri Lanka's Tamil and Sinhalese a team, and like many other countries as possible to help persuade each of the teams nationals. The structure of competition makes huge mismatches very rare, and after the last round of play (= four sets of medals), five teams medal arise: Gold, silver, bronze, Little Giant (did well in comparison with the range of the population) and Best Breeder (did well compared with past years) - What do you think would happen? And Do you agree with me that this would be a great way to get states to unite, and it would be fun if I could get a national team of Myanmar, Bhutan, Tibet, China, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Maldives, Iran and Iraq to join too?
Cricket Local is everywhere, and also based tournaments. Cricket diplomacy will not improve anything.
Posted in Pocet Knives on 02/08/2010 09:11 pm by Blade Runner
|
Who's better Colt McCoy or Sam Bradford?
All my friends think Bradford is better because it has a Heisman and broke a silly record. But I'm going to prove them wrong! So who is better and why?
This is a very difficult question because both are collegiate All-Stars and their situations are so different that it is difficult to judge. Bradford Oklahoma did its best with a plethora of weapons to win the Heisman, but McCoy showed how brave and smart he really is while leading the Longhorns to a season nobody expected. If you look at their resumes in general and how they translate to the professionals though, I'll give the nod to Bradford. Last year McCoy trouble actually doing anything, while Bradford lit a freshman red shirt. You never see Bradford makes a mistake and that is a big factor. There can be as mobile as is Colt, but has a stronger arm, is higher in the pocket, and always takes the right decision. You can not ask more than that can you?
